<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The “All-Natural” Way to Play Penny Pharma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pennysleuth.com/the-%e2%80%9call-natural%e2%80%9d-way-to-play-penny-pharma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pennysleuth.com/the-%e2%80%9call-natural%e2%80%9d-way-to-play-penny-pharma/</link>
	<description>Penny stocks, small-cap stocks, pink sheet stocks and OTCBB coverage by unbiased and independent analysts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WL Banning</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/the-%e2%80%9call-natural%e2%80%9d-way-to-play-penny-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-15897</link>
		<dc:creator>WL Banning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.com/?p=2794#comment-15897</guid>
		<description>This is very important for the public to learn about.
 I was on radio over all the USA. in 1992 with DR.WEST, telling people to call their congressman ;To require
alternative medicIne be signed in to the USA by Congress; Alternative medicine was approved by Congress for the USA. June 14,1993  . Alternative is protcted by LAW now in the USA.
This is a good articile that you wrote
wlb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very important for the public to learn about.<br />
 I was on radio over all the USA. in 1992 with DR.WEST, telling people to call their congressman ;To require<br />
alternative medicIne be signed in to the USA by Congress; Alternative medicine was approved by Congress for the USA. June 14,1993  . Alternative is protcted by LAW now in the USA.<br />
This is a good articile that you wrote<br />
wlb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/the-%e2%80%9call-natural%e2%80%9d-way-to-play-penny-pharma/comment-page-1/#comment-15737</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.com/?p=2794#comment-15737</guid>
		<description>As recently as February of this year, the FDA banned vitamin B6, or pyridoxamine, by “declaring it to be a drug.” 

I don&#039;t think the ruling was final and it certainly is not in effect at this time. I can find pyridoxamine at many reputable vitamins sellers on the internet. As I understand it the ruling has been challenged and I doubt the FDA will get away with it. The best outcome could be similar to what happened when a pharmaceutical company came out with a high-priced fish oil supplement that was no better than the OTC versions. As could be predicted, hospitals prefer the overpriced pharmaceutical version to the reasonably priced OTC one. I guess it&#039;s a win-win situation: the pharma gets their high price through the hospital/physician channels while the consumer buys the OTC version off the shelf. As long as the FDA does not interfere, then both sides should be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As recently as February of this year, the FDA banned vitamin B6, or pyridoxamine, by “declaring it to be a drug.” </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the ruling was final and it certainly is not in effect at this time. I can find pyridoxamine at many reputable vitamins sellers on the internet. As I understand it the ruling has been challenged and I doubt the FDA will get away with it. The best outcome could be similar to what happened when a pharmaceutical company came out with a high-priced fish oil supplement that was no better than the OTC versions. As could be predicted, hospitals prefer the overpriced pharmaceutical version to the reasonably priced OTC one. I guess it&#8217;s a win-win situation: the pharma gets their high price through the hospital/physician channels while the consumer buys the OTC version off the shelf. As long as the FDA does not interfere, then both sides should be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

