<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Penny Sleuth &#187; little cash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pennysleuth.com/tag/little-cash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pennysleuth.com</link>
	<description>Penny stocks, small-cap stocks, pink sheet stocks and OTCBB coverage by unbiased and independent analysts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It Pays to Be Picky</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/it-pays-to-be-picky/</link>
		<comments>http://pennysleuth.com/it-pays-to-be-picky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Boric</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Over the Counter Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullish on small-caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good Value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Boric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[little cash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lowering of Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small-cap market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small-cap Rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tons of debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weak Fundamentals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.com/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irwin Greenstein reports from Baltimore&#8217;s Cultural District&#8230; *** The IPO market is hot again…opening the spigot for a flood of small-cap opportunities in 2005. But why now? Before I answer that question, let me recap 2004&#8242;s extraordinary action. Last year, 205 IPOs raised some $41 billion &#8212; triple the volume of 2003&#8230;and shy of the [...]<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/it-pays-to-be-picky/">It Pays to Be Picky</a> was originally featured in the <a href="http://pennysleuth.com">Penny Sleuth</a>. </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Normal">Irwin Greenstein reports from Baltimore&#8217;s Cultural  District&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">*** The IPO market is hot again…opening the spigot for a  flood of small-cap </span><br />
<span class="Normal">opportunities in 2005. But why  now? Before I answer that question, let me recap 2004&#8242;s extraordinary  action.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Last year, 205 IPOs raised some $41 billion &#8212; triple the  volume of 2003&#8230;and shy of the 249 in the IPO mania of 1999. Unlike the bubble  years, however, companies are more financially solid: 64% of companies that went  public in 2004 were already profitable, compared to 2000, when only 26% were  profitable. And the average 2004 IPO has risen 30% from its offering price &#8212;  the best performance since 1999. That return beat the Dow, Nasdaq and S&amp;P  500.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">OK, so why now? I think that the increased IPO activity  coincides with rising interest rates, which can really hurt small-cap companies.  As lending institutions tighten their requirements for loans to companies with  market caps of $1 billion or less, we&#8217;ll see more small caps turning to the  public market for cash. Alan Greenspan signaled Wall Street far in advance of  the first rate hike, giving the venture capitalists and investment bankers  plenty of time to start filling the IPO pipeline&#8230;and the momentum is certainly  there.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Is this a good thing? From my perspective, the answer is a  resounding yes. Here&#8217;s why. In the 15 years I spent in Silicon Valley before  moving to Baltimore, I saw just about every tech prophecy come true &#8212;  eventually. All that nutty stuff we read about during the bubble, such as  e-commerce, broadband to the home and streaming entertainment, are big hits now  &#8212; long after Wall Street lost patience with many of those money-losing  innovators. Well, I think everyone is wiser now. After all, hindsight is always  20/20.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">But looking ahead, about 80 VC-backed companies have  already registered with the SEC for IPOs in 2005. And we believe that this is  going to be a great year for newly public companies. That&#8217;s why you can expect  to see more coverage in Penny Sleuth of the IPO market as it pertains to  small-cap opportunities. We&#8217;re all looking forward to the extra coverage here at  Penny Sleuth central, and I hope that you are, too.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">*** It&#8217;s 11:46 a.m. &#8212; almost midday. And as I write this,  the big winner (relatively speaking) in this rabid bear market is the small-cap  S&amp;P 600.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">The S&amp;P 600 is down only 2.02%, to 310.98. Compare  that to the S&amp;P 500, which is down 4.73%, the Dow, which has taken a 41.03%  tumble, or the Nasdaq&#8217;s decline of 10.94%. In fact, the S&amp;P 600 is even  beating the leading small-cap index, the Russell 2000, which so far has  registered a decline of 5.26%, to 612.48.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">One reason the S&amp;P 600 is weathering this storm could  be that compared to the Russell 2000, it has more stringent requirements. For  example, S&amp;P 600 criteria include financial viability, liquidity and an  adequate number of shares available for trade &#8212; making it tougher to get on the  index than on the Russell 2000.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">While regular Penny Sleuth readers know that we love the  Russell 2000, it&#8217;s times like this that remind us that the S&amp;P 600 could be  the small-cap index of choice when the bear comes knocking.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">As James talks about in this issue, diversification is  always important.  That&#8217;s why it would be wise to also spread out your  investments across multiple small-cap indices (including the Wilshire 1750).   Each one has different standards for inclusion, and given the nature of stocking  picking the best one can often depend on market conditions.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">*** Speaking of James, he takes to task the chronic  optimists of stock </span><br />
<span class="Normal">commentators&#8230;everything&#8217;s  good, everything&#8217;s great, never a bad year that ends in 5, blah, blah, blah.   Well, steely eyed James sees clouds on the horizon and provides us with sobering  advice. James, pop open that umbrella of yours&#8230;</span><br />
<span class="Normal"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong><span class="pny-subhead-black">It Pays to Be Picky</span></strong></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Something just doesn&#8217;t seem right, my friends. I&#8217;ve spent  the last week reading article after article on the small-cap market &#8212; getting  people&#8217;s &#8220;professional&#8221; predictions for 2005. And most analysts are still  calling for another bullish year for small-cap stocks. For  instance&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Professionals from Mesirow Financial&#8217;s Investment  Management and Real Estate divisions say, &#8220;In 2005, we expect to see  high-single-digit returns from the S&amp;P 500. Dividend income will, once  again, be significant as payout ratios continue to rise. The outperformance of  small-cap stocks and value stocks will continue in 2005.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Diane Swonk, chief economist for Mesirow Financial, was  even more optimistic, </span><span class="Normal">describing today&#8217;s economy  as &#8220;virtuous&#8221; and primed for profit growth. And finally, Donald Luskin, writing  for <a href="http://smartmoney.com/">SmartMoney.com</a>, titled his Dec. 31  article, &#8220;Get Ready for Another Strong Year.&#8221; He forecasts that (after a bumpy  start to 2005), &#8220;By spring, stocks will have moved on to new highs.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Jeez, you would think I&#8217;d be ecstatic about these  predictions. But I&#8217;m not. In fact, I think they are all wrong. And you need to  know that. You see, there are two reasons the small-cap rally, which began six  years ago, started in the first place. And neither one of those reasons exists  in today&#8217;s market. </span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Let me explain&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">By the end of 1999, small-cap stocks were trading for a  30% discount to their larger peers. Throughout the 1990s, investors were dumping  their money into companies like IBM, JDS Uniphase and Sun Microsystems. As a  result, between 1995 and 1999, large caps enjoyed 20%-plus annual returns.  Meanwhile, small caps lagged behind &#8212; big time. In August 1998, the small-cap  market fell 18.3% &#8212; making it one of the worst plunges in over 70 years. Ouch!  But that fiasco led the way for the start of a major buying spree that has  lasted for six years now.</span><br />
<span class="Normal"> </span><br />
<span class="Normal">And the second reason the small-cap rally took off more than half a  decade ago was the lowering of interest rates. Between July 2000 and June 2004,  interest rates fell from 6.5% to 1%. As a result, smaller companies could borrow  money much more cheaply. They had instant access to the capital markets that  they didn&#8217;t have in the early 1990s (when all the money was being lent to the  larger tech companies). And they could grow their own businesses through debt &#8212;  which led to rapid earnings and sales for years to come. For  example&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Earnings for small-cap companies grew a whopping 71% in  2003. That&#8217;s amazing, when you think about it. And because of the tremendous  earnings growth, the Russell 2000 rose 46% in 2003 &#8212; beating every other major  stock index in the United States.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Between 1999 and 2004, the equation for a small-cap rally  was in place: value + low interest rates = small-cap rally. And what a rally it  was. But that equation has changed now. And all the talking heads who proclaim  2005 is going to be another banner year for all small-cap stocks are out of  their minds. (But that&#8217;s still not to say there won&#8217;t be a lot of great  opportunities &#8212; there will. And I&#8217;ll explain in a second.)</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Unlike in 1999, small-cap stocks aren&#8217;t cheap. In fact,  they are more expensive than large caps now. The average company on the Russell  2000 trades for 21.5 times earnings. By comparison, the average large-cap  company on the Russell 1000 trades for 19 times earnings.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">And in case you haven&#8217;t noticed, interest rates (although  still historically low at 2.25%) are on the rise. Alan Greenspan and his gang  have raised rates in each of the last five Fed meetings. And general consensus  is that rates will continue to rise in 2005 &#8212; eventually topping out between  3.5% and 4.25% by the end of December.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Sure, those rates are still low. But that&#8217;s not the point.  The formula that was in place in 1999 has changed. Small-cap stocks aren&#8217;t  cheaper than their large-cap peers anymore. And the interest rates are rising –  slowly making it more expensive for smaller companies to borrow money and grow  through debt. </span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">The HUGE advantages that small-cap companies had a few  years ago are gone.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">So is it time to panic? </span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">No. This rally isn&#8217;t going to come crashing down in the  next month. It will correct a bit &#8212; which is happening now. So you should make  sure you are properly diversified. You shouldn&#8217;t have more than 10-25% of your  portfolio in small-cap stocks. And you need to consider what kinds of small-cap  stocks you are holding onto. Obviously, the stocks that will crash the hardest  are those with little in the way of cash, a ton of debt and weak fundamentals.  Those are the kinds of companies that will need to borrow even more money in the  future &#8212; just to stay afloat. Problem is, they won&#8217;t get that money as lenders  become pickier and pickier about who gets their loans.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Still, let me remind you&#8230;</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">There are over 4,000 small-cap stocks to pick through  today. I guarantee hundreds of them will rise in 2005. This isn&#8217;t a time to  panic. Rather, it&#8217;s a time to be picky. And if you stick with Penny Stock  Fortunes (</span><span class="Normal"><a href="http://www.psfortunes.com/">www.psfortunes.com</a></span><span class="Normal">) and Penny Sleuth&#8230;we&#8217;ll help you find those companies worth  owning.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Yours for Penny Sleuth,</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">James Boric</span></p>
<p><em>January 11, 2005</em></p>
<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/it-pays-to-be-picky/">It Pays to Be Picky</a> was originally featured in the <a href="http://pennysleuth.com">Penny Sleuth</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pennysleuth.com/it-pays-to-be-picky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

