<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Penny Sleuth &#187; Investing In Robotics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pennysleuth.com/tag/investing-in-robotics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pennysleuth.com</link>
	<description>Penny stocks, small-cap stocks, pink sheet stocks and OTCBB coverage by unbiased and independent analysts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This Small Robotics Company Could Be the Next Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/this-small-robotics-company-could-be-the-next-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://pennysleuth.com/this-small-robotics-company-could-be-the-next-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Fluctuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuitive Surgical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuitive trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing In Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical robotics Stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next PC Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Utility Robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relatively big cap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Robotics Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.cfdev20.com/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The robotics industry, as Bill Gates recently said, is the next PC industry. Investing in robotics today is comparable to buying companies like Apple, IBM or Intel in the early days of personal computers. Robotics will grow into a major industry, and it will grow fast. Within 10 years, some roboticists say, personal utility robots [...]<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/this-small-robotics-company-could-be-the-next-microsoft/">This Small Robotics Company Could Be the Next Microsoft</a> was originally featured in the <a href="http://pennysleuth.com">Penny Sleuth</a>. </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Normal"></span><span class="Normal">The robotics industry, as Bill Gates recently said, is the next PC industry. Investing in robotics today is comparable to buying companies like Apple, IBM or Intel in the early days of personal computers. Robotics will grow into a major industry, and it will grow fast.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Within 10 years, some roboticists say, personal utility robots will have the ability to do everything from cleaning your toilets and washing dishes to keeping your schedule and monitoring your vital signs. That may actually be a pessimistic projection. On the higher-tech side, they will automate advanced microchip and biotech production lines. They will also perform sophisticated surgeries that are impossible today.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">If this seems far-fetched, I would caution you to think twice. Think back 10 years. Did you think then that we would be using the advanced Web-connected cell phone/PDA/media player devices that are common today? If you are a physician, as are many of my readers, did you foresee the current state of medical robotics?</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Additionally, the medical industry has a particular advantage during a recession. Health care is one of the sectors most protected from business cycles and economic slowdowns. We cut back or eliminate lots of things when budgets get tight. Non-elective surgery isn’t one of them.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Moreover, the medical robotics industry is far from unproven. For an example of the kind of profits that exist in this barely tapped field, let’s take a look at Intuitive Surgical.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">In January 2003, you could have picked up Intuitive Surgical for $6.02 per share. As I write, Intuitive is trading around $200. Prior to the current fluctuations, it was trading around $300. Its revenues and growth prospects justify that price. Even if it never recovers, which is an absurd assumption, Intuitive will have increased in value 3,000% percent in five years. I consider that a decent profit and a good start at true transformational status.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Though Intuitive has lots of room to grow, I’m not recommending it. It’s a bargain during this downturn, but I try to keep our stocks around or under the $10-dollar mark, to give my readers more buying options.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Anyway, its market cap is relatively big, so we’d be pretty diluted buying today. My goal is to get readers into transformative stocks before the average investor figures out what’s going on.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">So I’m going to recommend another medical robotics stock. Today, there are two relatively well-known candidates in the field. Both are still in the small-cap stage, and both have gone after the heart surgery market. Both have made their own mistakes, and both are in the process of overcoming FDA rulings. Both are currently losing money, as did Intuitive in its early days, but they’re both also gaining in sales. Both get revenues from the sales of disposables needed for each new surgery, as well their surgical systems.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">In my current issue of <em>Breakthrough Technology Alert</em>, I analyze the two companies and select the stock that’s best equipped to survive and thrive in the short and long runs. </span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Yours for transformational profits,<br />
Patrick Cox</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal"><br />
<em>November 5, 2008</em></span></p>
<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/this-small-robotics-company-could-be-the-next-microsoft/">This Small Robotics Company Could Be the Next Microsoft</a> was originally featured in the <a href="http://pennysleuth.com">Penny Sleuth</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pennysleuth.com/this-small-robotics-company-could-be-the-next-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investing in the Chip Revolution</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/investing-in-the-chip-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://pennysleuth.com/investing-in-the-chip-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-D chip fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BeSang Inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chip manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing In Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memristors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.cfdev20.com/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, a tiny semiconductor design startup, BeSang Inc., announced a breakthrough in 3-D chip fabrication. Specifically, it touted a new technique for radically improving the performance and cost-effectiveness of chips produced by conventional chip manufacturing processes. The technique itself was developed by BeSang, based in Beaverton, Ore., with the assistance of Stanford University’s nanofabrication [...]<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/investing-in-the-chip-revolution/">Investing in the Chip Revolution</a> was originally featured in the <a href="http://pennysleuth.com">Penny Sleuth</a>. </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Normal">Last year, a tiny semiconductor design startup, BeSang Inc., announced a breakthrough in 3-D chip fabrication. Specifically, it touted a new technique for radically improving the performance and cost-effectiveness of chips produced by conventional chip manufacturing processes.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">The technique itself was developed by BeSang, based in Beaverton, Ore., with the assistance of Stanford University’s nanofabrication researchers. For the first time, BeSang claimed, chips could grow upward, not just outward, without significantly raising costs.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">At the time, I doubted implementation would come anytime soon. Apparently, I was wrong. BeSang and Stanford have just announced that their 3-D IC manufacturing process is available for licensing now.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Needless to say, I’ll be watching BeSang and its 25 patents in case it goes public.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">My point, however, is that Moore’s Law is going to hold. The number of transistors that can be inexpensively placed on an integrated circuit will continue to double approximately every two years. New technologies and products will continue to emerge.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Moreover, they will yield the kind of profits that come only from breakthrough, transformative industries. Robotics is one of them. Count on it.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Let me give you just one more chip breakthrough set to maintain this breakneck pace. This one could actually be more significant, because it isn’t about transistor density. It is about the way that chips work.</span></p>
<p align="center"><span class="Normal"><strong>Memristors Coming Soon</strong></span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Since 1971, computer scientists have theorized about memristors. This hypothetical component would maintain information without electrical currents, but function as dynamic RAM memory.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">This is a huge deal. Computers with memristors would be faster and require less power. Booting would be nearly instantaneous. On/off buttons could become irrelevant, except to avoid accidental activation. Battery life for mobile devices, including robots, would be extended significantly.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">HP proved that it could, in theory, make these once mythological “fourth components” using new nanotech tools. When I reported its claims, though, I speculated in vague terms about future production. Honestly, I was thinking four or five years out. According to the reliable EETimes, HP Labs will produce prototypes next year. Commercialization is expected to follow quickly.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">In the space of months, the IC road map has changed profoundly. Once again, chip designers are going “back to drawing board” to rethink the future of microprocessors. Specific to this issue, memristors, combined with increased chip density and more efficient batteries, are exactly what it will take to move robotics to the next level.</span></p>
<p align="center"><span class="Normal"><strong>The Incredible Promise of Robotics</strong></span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Today, there are about one million industrial robots in service. That number is increasing over 10% annually. The international automotive industry depends entirely on robots, as do several other manufacturing fields.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Chip manufacturing, biotech and pharmaceutical companies rely on robotics to perform precise and repetitive functions in environments intolerable to humans. Also relevant to a subject covered in this issue, robotics will be central to the commercialization of stem cell therapies.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">Another area of rapid robotic growth is security and defense. Some of the earliest recognizable robots were remote-controlled bomb detonation units. Today, unmanned military vehicles can pilot themselves in hazardous situations. Some are simple devices used for bomb inspections and detonation. Some are sophisticated mobile weapons systems. Many are utility vehicles ranging from self-driving trucks to relatively small “PackBots” that climb stairs, risk tripwires, find land mines and look around corners. Some are armed and can be fired remotely or return fire automatically. Though the public may not think of them as robots, automated missile systems have been around for decades.</span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">I recently found a company that is really set to take advantage of this surge of chip technology and robots. Unfortunately, it’s far too small to include in such a large publication like <em>Penny Sleuth</em>. That’s why I saved it for my <em>Breakthrough Technology Alert</em> subscribers. </span></p>
<p><span class="Normal">For transformational profits,<br />
Patrick Cox<br />
September 16, 2008</span></p>
<p><a href="http://pennysleuth.com/investing-in-the-chip-revolution/">Investing in the Chip Revolution</a> was originally featured in the <a href="http://pennysleuth.com">Penny Sleuth</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pennysleuth.com/investing-in-the-chip-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

