<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only Two Years to Practical Nuclear Fusion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pennysleuth.com/only-two-years-to-practical-nuclear-fusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pennysleuth.com/only-two-years-to-practical-nuclear-fusion/</link>
	<description>Penny stocks, small-cap stocks, pink sheet stocks and OTCBB coverage by unbiased and independent analysts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/only-two-years-to-practical-nuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-16895</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.com/?p=4061#comment-16895</guid>
		<description>The formula E=mc^2 m is mass  and c^2 is the speed of light squared. Destroying 1 kg of matter creates 9*10^16 Joules of energy. That&#039;s 3,000,000,000 litres of petrol/gasoline. However in fusion/fission only a small amount of matter is destroyed so the energy return is only roughly a few million times better than chemical reactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The formula E=mc^2 m is mass  and c^2 is the speed of light squared. Destroying 1 kg of matter creates 9*10^16 Joules of energy. That&#8217;s 3,000,000,000 litres of petrol/gasoline. However in fusion/fission only a small amount of matter is destroyed so the energy return is only roughly a few million times better than chemical reactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed McPhail</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/only-two-years-to-practical-nuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-16864</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed McPhail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.com/?p=4061#comment-16864</guid>
		<description>E=mc^2 correct so if I have two pounds of uranium instead of 1500 pounds of coal power i now have 1500^2 correct or am i misunderstanding the formula?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E=mc^2 correct so if I have two pounds of uranium instead of 1500 pounds of coal power i now have 1500^2 correct or am i misunderstanding the formula?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Simon</title>
		<link>http://pennysleuth.com/only-two-years-to-practical-nuclear-fusion/comment-page-1/#comment-16856</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pennysleuth.com/?p=4061#comment-16856</guid>
		<description>I see you are keeping up. Excellent!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you are keeping up. Excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

