Invest in Space, the Final Frontier for Your Portfolio

Start your Free Tomorrow In Review Preview - Sign Up Here:

Jul 2nd, 2010 | By | Category: Featured, Penny stocks, Technology
leadimage

Forget about science fiction… cheaper private space access may actually be just around the corner. Earlier this month, PayPal founder Elon Musk’s space exploration company, SpaceX, moved us closer to that goal. It did so by successfully launching a medium-lift rocket into low Earth orbit.

SpaceX was the first company to launch a privately funded rocket, Falcon 1, into orbit in late 2008. Other rockets being used by the defense industry are privately manufactured, of course, but they are the product of taxpayer funding. The Falcon is the first orbital platform that adheres to what we could consider an effort of free market entrepreneurship.

The new rocket, called Falcon 9, is of a more powerful design, with sufficient thrust to bring passengers into orbit. The payload was an unmanned space capsule, called Dragon. It is a test bed for a future human-rated space vehicle. It is orbiting the planet as I write. It is scheduled to return to Earth in a few weeks.

SpaceX has pursued a simple, redundant, scalable design for their rockets. Falcon 9, for example, uses the same Merlin engines as the Falcon 1. As its name suggests, Falcon 9’s first stage uses nine Merlins. The second stage also uses a Merlin engine, with modifications for reignition and operation in a vacuum. This reduces the final cost of the launch vehicle.

Having multiple engines also improves reliability for the same reason that multiengined aircraft are safer. The rocket can lose an engine and still make it into space. Since reuse also helps reduce costs, the Dragon capsule is designed to perform many missions. Eventually, SpaceX wants to reuse the first and second stages, as well.

Although many have regretted the cancellation of Constellation, NASA’s future space vehicle program, it might actually prove a catalyst for increased long-term space exploration. Rather than depending on a vast wasteful bureaucracy to design and launch rockets, the U.S. space program contracts out transportation services to more efficient startups like SpaceX. No more mythical $600 toilet seats. Instead of a single platform, a diversity of many smaller players will emerge in the space launch business. This is the sort of environment that cuts costs and improves performance.

With the Space Shuttle winding down as a launch platform, SpaceX has already earned contracts to resupply the International Space Station to the tune of $1.8 billion. Full ISS resupply missions are scheduled for 2011. Following on June’s successful Falcon 9 launch, SpaceX also inked the largest launch contract in history. Iridium Communications plans to put its next-generation communications satellites in space via SpaceX and has signed a $500 billion contract with SpaceX to do so.

I strongly suspect that if space launch costs fall enough, we will be seeing space access put to commercial use in unexpected ways. How many people saw the eventual existence of Google, Facebook or even Musk’s own PayPal back when the Internet was a small government defense network?

Even with more efficient designs and organizational structures, however, rocket technology of the kind being used by SpaceX suffers from the same drawback: propellant. More than 70% of the mass required to get to orbit is fuel. When we consider a possible return to the Moon, this rises to over 95%. Of course, Quicklaunch Inc. is working on resolving this problem. If you recall, I told Penny Sleuth readers about that emerging company back in March – and I told my Breakthrough Technology Alert readers about it well before then.

Moving fuel and oxidizer is the single most important logistical component of any space mission. Dr. Hunter believes that the space gun technology he pioneered at Lawrence Livermore would reduce launch costs for fuel to 5% of the current price. An orbiting fuel depot would be a crucial piece of infrastructure for future missions to the moon or Mars. Space gun technology, however, can’t be used for humans. The acceleration required to get vehicle to orbital speed is simply too great. This leaves the market for passengers open to companies like SpaceX, which has designed the Falcon for human space launch from the very beginning.

Mark Twain once famously said that history does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme. In a sense, access to orbit is taking a path similar to what colonial exploration did in the 15th and 16th centuries. Early expeditions were government-sponsored affairs. Christopher Columbus, for instance, was funded by the Spanish crown. However, over time, private enterprises came to dominate the sea routes to the New World. A competitive market of private space taxis will lower the cost to get to orbit, and will open up new vistas for space exploration. Like the early venture capitalists looking to get rich in the New World, today’s investors will also grow wealthy.

We hope to see space access companies like SpaceX go public in the future. And of course, I’ll be keeping a close eye on emerging opportunities for small-cap investors in this space.

For Transformational Profits,
Patrick Cox
Penny Sleuth

July 2, 2010

Related Posts


Author Image for Patrick Cox

Patrick Cox

Patrick Cox has lived deep inside the world of transformative technologies for over 25 years. In the 1980s, he worked in computer software development and manufacturing. By the mid-1990s, he worked as a consultant for Netscape — the company that handled 90% of all Internet browsing traffic at the time. InfoWorld and USA Today have featured Patrick's research numerous times. He's also appeared on Crossfire and Nightline. Patrick has been quoted by The Wall Street Journal and Reason magazine. His expertise brought him to Agora Financial, where he now heads Breakthrough Technology Alert, the only place you'll find the truly transformational technologies that offer exponential gains.

Start your free Tomorrow in Review email subscription...

  

We Will Not Share Your Email Address
We Value Your Privacy

Related Posts


Tags: , ,
ShareThis
Print This Post Print This Post

One comment
Leave a comment »

  1. Dear Mr. Cox,

    I was wondering if you had any thoughts about Celceutix (CTIX) as they enter Phase 1 trial on Kevetrin at Dana Farber? Where do you see the company/stock going on favorable trial results? Thanks!

Leave Comment

By submitting your comment you agree to adhere to our comment policy.